IdcBuster - 39元/月 Xen 8核 512M 20G 500G 洛杉矶PR

2013年05月26日 14905 字数 25792 阅读 19 评论 标签:OpenVZ · Xen · 洛杉矶 · idcbuster.com

文章导读

IdcBuster是在美华人运营VPS主机商,采用XenOpenVZ架构,数据中心在洛杉矶PR(速度优秀),五月码:may66全场66折,购买x512方案 ¥39元/月(购买链接)配置如下:

  • 8 CPU Cores, 512MB RAM
  • 20GB Raid10 DiskSpace
  • 500GB Bandwidth @ 1Gbps
  • Xen/SolusVM

IdcBuster成立于2007年,前身为TongSite.COM(目前仍在运营中),属于老牌主机商,今年与HardBirch合并后,主推廉价虚拟主机空间和无管理型VPS,提供基于OpenVZ、Xen、KVM技术的美国VPS主机,亦选用了洛杉矶PR机房作为主数据中心。即使为廉价VPS,其所有服务器依然均为服务器级CPU、RAID10阵列和G级端口。

洛杉矶PR 测试IP:173.254.246.105 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示

[root@vpsmm-test ~]# free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           512         17        494          0          0          8
-/+ buffers/cache:          9        502
Swap:            0          0          0
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# df -hal
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs             20G  441M   20G   3% /
proc                     0     0     0   -  /proc
sysfs                    0     0     0   -  /sys
none                     0     0     0   -  /dev/pts
none                     0     0     0   -  /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc

[root@vpsmm-test ~]# cat /proc/couinfo
cat: /proc/couinfo: No such file or directory
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 30
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X3450  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 5
cpu MHz		: 359.765
cache size	: 8192 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 8
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 0
initial apicid	: 0
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov ...
bogomips	: 5333.04
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 30
model name	: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X3450  @ 2.67GHz
stepping	: 5
cpu MHz		: 359.765
cache size	: 8192 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 8
core id		: 1
cpu cores	: 4
apicid		: 2
initial apicid	: 2
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 11
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov ...
bogomips	: 5333.04
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

[root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.81562 seconds, 70.4 MB/s
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.45889 seconds, 77.6 MB/s
[root@vpsmm-test ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.62985 seconds, 74.0 MB/s

[root@vpsmm-test ~]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--08:47:02--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'
100%[============================================>] 104,857,600 12.9M/s   in 7.8s   
08:47:10 (12.7 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: vpsmm-test: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab062.2 -- #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 18:28:35 MSK 2012
   Machine: i686 (i386)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz (5333.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
 SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz (5333.0 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT,
 SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
   08:50:28 up  1:51,  1 user,  load average: 0.48, 0.17, 0.05; runlevel 3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 05 2012 08:50:28 - 09:19:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        6428353.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2373.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1952.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        368721.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          102421.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        770854.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              785015.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  66444.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5815.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2304.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    260.9 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         898960.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    6428353.0    550.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2373.5    431.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1952.2    454.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     368721.9    931.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     102421.6    618.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     770854.7   1329.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     785015.4    631.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      66444.8    166.1
Process Creation                                126.0       5815.6    461.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2304.7    543.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        260.9    434.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     898960.3    599.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         536.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Wed Dec 05 2012 09:19:38 - 09:51:57
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        5208753.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4456.6 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2082.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        218369.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           62332.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        555236.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              600195.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  75842.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5264.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2048.4 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    252.8 lpm   (60.3 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         732611.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    5208753.2    446.3
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4456.6    810.3
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2082.1    484.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     218369.9    551.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      62332.0    376.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     555236.3    957.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     600195.2    482.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      75842.9    189.6
Process Creation                                126.0       5264.8    417.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2048.4    483.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        252.8    421.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     732611.9    488.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         475.1

洛杉矶PR 测试IP:173.254.246.105 / 100mb / php探针 / wordpress演示

  • 序号
  • Ping的地点
  • 响应IP
  • 响应时间
  • TTL
  • 1
  • 香港[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 166毫秒
  • 54
  • 2
  • 广东东莞[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 166毫秒
  • 49
  • 3
  • 江苏镇江[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 153毫秒
  • 50
  • 4
  • 云南昆明[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 194毫秒
  • 51
  • 5
  • 深圳[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 169毫秒
  • 49
  • 6
  • 安徽淮北[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 157毫秒
  • 53
  • 7
  • 四川德阳[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 194毫秒
  • 50
  • 8
  • 江苏扬州[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 167毫秒
  • 51
  • 9
  • 上海[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 144毫秒
  • 51
  • 10
  • 陕西西安[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 231毫秒
  • 51
  • 11
  • 四川绵阳[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 229毫秒
  • 53
  • 12
  • 江苏无锡[电信]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 140毫秒
  • 49
  • 13
  • 河南郑州[多线]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 234毫秒
  • 52
  • 14
  • 上海[多线]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 171毫秒
  • 47
  • 15
  • 宁波[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 216毫秒
  • 49
  • 16
  • 河南[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 287毫秒
  • 53
  • 17
  • 辽宁[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 242毫秒
  • 54
  • 18
  • 深圳[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 259毫秒
  • 52
  • 19
  • 北京[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 192毫秒
  • 46
  • 20
  • 安徽滁州[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 223毫秒
  • 52
  • 21
  • 广东[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 234毫秒
  • 52
  • 22
  • 上海[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 237毫秒
  • 53
  • 23
  • 天津[联通]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 201毫秒
  • 46
  • 24
  • 上海[移动]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 193毫秒
  • 52
  • 25
  • 福建厦门[移动]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 198毫秒
  • 49
  • 26
  • 深圳[移动]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 179毫秒
  • 49
  • 27
  • 河北[移动]
  • 173.254.246.105
  • 230毫秒
  • 48
最快:江苏无锡[电信] 140 毫秒 ### 最慢:河南[联通] 287 毫秒
电信平均:175 毫秒 ### 联通平均:232 毫秒

小夜博客仅做资料收集,不对商家任何信息及交易做信用担保,购买前请注意风险,有交易纠纷请自行解决。